The Crowd

A recent Nova Scotia case caught the attention of the insurance community following a decision of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Garden View Restaurant v. The Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co. The circumstances of the case are not particularly novel. An oil spill occurred at the Plaintiff’s property after a length of copper pipe was stolen from the heating oil system by vandals. The Defendant insurer denied coverage for remediation of the land under the building affected by the esc...
More

CASE COMMENT: Moore v. Getahun, 2015 ONCA 55

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Moore v. Getahun has wide-ranging implications across Canada for all parties who engage experts. We anticipate the decision being followed in Nova Scotia. It holds that while impartiality of experts is of critical importance in litigation, this does not require a ban on communication between experts and the lawyers who retain them. In fact, lawyers play an important role in assisting experts to deliver a report that is intelligible and responsi...
More

CASE COMMENT: Hernandez v. Purcell, 2013 NSSC 303

This recent decision of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court provided timely guidance to the Board of Examiners in Psychology as well as to litigants in two matters involving a similar issue of disclosure of raw psychological test data. The two personal injury cases both involved allegations of psychological sequelae and the Defendants had requested provision of raw test data as part of the Plaintiff’s disclosure. The two psychologists responded to the disclosure requests by supplying the raw data to ...
More

CASE COMMENT: MacAulay v. Ali 2013 NSSC 271

The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently released this decision on an unsuccessful summary judgment motion. The motion was brought by a defendant in a personal injury claim involving a Metro Transit passenger who alleged injuries suffered during a collision with the defendant’s vehicle. The decision raises questions as to the admissibility of evidence often traditionally attached to affidavits of administrative personnel (whether insurance adjusters or paralegals) who have no personal kno...
More

CASE COMMENT: Burton Canada Co. v. Coady et al, 2013 NSCA 95

On August 30th, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal released its 4-1 decision upholding the right of a young plaintiff to sue the owner of a ski resort where he sustained injuries that left him paralyzed, as well as the snowboard manufacturer which was offering free rides on their products (along with free samples of high-energy drinks) on the day the plaintiff fell. The defendants had moved for summary judgment in 2011 and the decision was released 16 months later. The motions judge was of the v...
More

“Who The Heck Are You People, Anyway??”: A Note To Insureds

If you landed on this post because your insurer informed you that we have been appointed as your legal counsel, rest assured that you are not the first person to have questions about our role. Maybe you were in a car accident and someone has sued you, or maybe you had an oil spill at your home or business and now your insurance company is looking to recover money paid out to you from some other party. There are numerous situations that might trigger our involvement, and they all stem from you...
More

CASE COMMENT: 3008361 Nova Scotia Ltd. v. Scotia Recycling Ltd., 2013 NSSC 256

This recent Supreme Court of Nova Scotia decision, on a motion by the plaintiff, reinforces the principle that a party seeking production carries the onus of establishing relevance. The case involves a 2007 fire at the defendant’s premises. It so happened that, subsequent to moving to a new location, the defendant experienced another fire in 2009 at the new premises. The plaintiff in the action regarding the 2007 fire made a motion to obtain documents relating to the 2009 fire. In holding...
More

UPDATED CASE COMMENT: Ocean v. Economical Mutual Insurance Co.

UPDATE - Registrar’s motion for dismissal adjourned until October 31, 2013. In a written decision released on August 7, 2013, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has refused to set the issue of liability in this longstanding matter down for appeal. The self-represented appellant, Ms. Ocean, had earlier lost a Registrar’s motion in which she had sought to be exempted from the obligation to produce a transcript of the trial. This would appear to put this appeal at a standstill in a case that...
More

Subrogation – has nothing to do with subs, bros, or…gation?

News stories frequently surface which tug at readers’ heartstrings. Landlord sues tenant whose unattended candle burned the apartment down. Property owner sues estate of driver who was killed when his car ran into a cottage. Multinational corporation sues small-town local business for shoddy roof repairs. Often these stories are accompanied by descriptions of the dismay and consternation experienced by the defendant in these cases. While those of us in the insurance industry are nodding sa...
More

The barbarians at the legal gate

That is how the CEO of one of the UK’s new-model law firms was introduced at a recent conference. http://bit.ly/14shDt1 While it may be amusing to picture us at C3 Legal wielding pitchforks and cudgels, there is a grain of truth to the “radical departure from the norm” spectre. We have decided that at our firm, investing in technology will take priority over investing in high-rent real estate. We have decided that we will act exclusively for insurers. We have decided that we will not be inter...
More